List of latest HWs that I think are great: [VR] Oculus Go, [VR] HTC Vive Pro, [AR] Vuzix Blade Smart Glasses, [MR] Microsoft HoloLens, [MR] Acer Mixed Reality headset
Preferred device for VR: Oculus Go
Large library of apps
Comfortable to use
Easy to use
No phones needed
2560×1400 resolution
Built in speakers and mics
Voice search
Preferred device for MR: HP Windows Mixed Reality headset
Easy to setup
Comfortable to wear
No need to attach additional sensors to use it
Works on a wide range of computer hardware
Sharp display
My criteria for a good VR/MR headset mostly depends on the user experience that it can provide. The installation and setup of the headset has to be fuss free with no need for additional software or hardware installation. Ideally, the user should be able to use the headset once the button is turned on. While the user uses the headset, it should be comfortable enough such that the user does not think of removing the headset during the experience. Last but not least, the graphics and resolution has to be high enough to provide an experience similar to real life.
– Standalone – Reasonable price for standalone – Comfortable to wear – Easy to set up and use
– Poor battery life – Controller batteries are non-rechargeable – Light leaks in from nose area
Pico Neo 2 Eye
– Standalone – Native eye-tracking technology in partnership with Tobii – Able to wirelessly connect to PC
– Controllers don’t look very ergonomic – Not actually yet released
Nintendo Labo VR Kit
– Fresh method to creating different types of controllers with cardboard and Joy-cons – Ability to create your own games with Toy-con Garage
– Limitations by the Nintendo Switch’s screen, such as low resolution and refresh rate – Only 3DOF
HTC Vive Cosmos
– High resolution and refresh rate – Headset cameras removes any need for external base stations – Modular faceplate design
– Requires gaming desktop PC with dedicated graphics card – Light sensitivity problems – Tethered
Sony Playstation VR
– Large selection of games to play – High refresh rate
– Requires external sensors – Tethered
Valve Index
– High resolution and refresh rate – Practical new controllers, strapped around your hands instead of held – Able to open and close hand s naturally instead of relying on abstractions like grip or trigger
Based on my current experiences with the HTC Vive and Oculus Quest, my preference is definitely for non-tethered VR headsets since the cable easily get’s tangled up and is easy to trip over. Ideally I would also prefer the VR device to not have to be dependent on a high-end PC to run.
Hence my preferred VR device would be the Oculus Quest, given its relatively cheap price compared to other standalone VR devices which provide 6DOF.
However, I am very interested in the Pico Neo 2 Eye which has the function of eye tracking since the common methods for gaze inputs is to have rotate the headset for the center pointer to “look” at objects, and look forward to seeing how it can perform.
Name
Pros
Cons
Tesseract Holoboard Enterprise Edition
– High FOV at 82° – Allows for teams to collaborate in MR – Seems relatively cheap
– Requires a smartphone with Snapdragon 820 processor or above in order for this device to operate.
Magic Leap One
– Standalone – 6DOF – Interchangeable components – Features advanced eye-tracking, even blinks can be as a command function for the user – Controller with force control and haptic feedback
– Pricey – Only 40° FOV – User has to carry the lightpack
Microsoft HoloLens2
– Standalone, no external packs – Gesturing and gaze tracking – Improved FOV at 52° compared to HoloLens 1
– Pricey
My pick for my preferred MR device would be the HoloLens2, it looks the most stylish and least clunky to put on. The hand gesture controls are also pretty cool.
Based on my previous experiences,
I have always found that VR HWs are either clunky, headache-inducing or just
too expensive for the normal consumer. I guess that’s why despite owning a
gaming laptop and a PlayStation that are perfectly capable of supporting VR
games, I never really bought into the hype.
That is until I bought a Nintendo
Switch last year and found this really cool addition that Nintendo has introduced
to the VR world:
Behold the Nintendo Labo VR Kit
made for the Nintendo Switch:
Before someone mocks the design
and appeal of this product (I mean who has heard of a cardboard headset? Is
this a copycat of the Google Cardboard VR?), hear me out on why this is one of
my favourite VR HWs! However, we first need to understand Nintendo’s motivations
behind creating such a product.
What Nintendo has done was truly bizarre
at the time when this product was released. Like many gaming and PC companies,
Nintendo wanted to enter the VR market, but it did not want to stand beside the
slew of competitors such as Microsoft, Google, HTC, Sony, who were all more
than capable of creating the best VRs HWs possible. Furthermore, Nintendo devices
have always been geared towards a younger audience and its latest Nintendo
Switch product doesn’t even have the graphical horsepower like most of its
competition such as the Xbox and PlayStation counterparts. Thus, Nintendo did
what it had to do, it created a VR headset that draws the users’ creativity at
a much lower price point, geared towards its own unique target audience.
The Nintendo Labo VR is a
cardboard VR headset that introduces features and accessories you think only a
company such a DIY company such as IKEA would think of. There are a range of
things to build and customize the VR headset with accessories such as a
Blaster, an Elephant, and even a Bird! These accessories make the VR experience
a truly unique one as they complement the cartoony and kid-friendly characteristics
of a typical Nintendo game. With a battery life depending on the Switch console
itself as well as graphic limitations, it is a good entry-point for
experiencing the VR world without worrying about charging ever so often.
As such, this product taps on the
creativity and imagination in you to experience a world of VR that is unlike many
traditional VR headsets. Thus, it is one of my favourite VR HWs.
Now that we have covered a VR HW
that is more for entry-level VR experiences, the next entry for my favourite MR
HW will be more serious in terms of specifications in order to blur the lines
between reality and virtual reality perfectly.
My favourite mixed-reality HW has
to be the Asus Windows MR headset (HC102)
Looks like something from the
future, doesn’t it?
At less than 400g (according to
Asus’ website), it is by far one of the lighter MR headsets and it features a design
that is ergonomic and elegant. One can simply just flip up the visor and take a
short breather when required; a plus for usability and user safety. However,
the best part of this headset is the fact that it is cheaper than most of its
competitors such as Samsung as well as an easy setup that doesn’t require too
much horsepower on your computer.
This makes it affordable and
available to the average consumer who just wants to get in on the action whilst
getting the same refresh rates and sufficient visuals that a MR headset needs.
As you can see from my choices, I
am particularly fond of companies that go out of their way to create something
unique, comfortable and affordable for consumers. Sure, my favourites don’t
provide the most graphically intense visuals or the best possible experience. However,
what is important to gamers and consumers is the illusion of a virtual/mixed
world that seems real enough to get you in on the action.
Author: Darren Sim A0136233N
Images are sourced from Google or the products’ respective websites.
Note: 3 DoF head-tracking means you can only track rotational movement. 6 DoF head-tracking means you can track both position and rotation.
Preferred VR headset:
I look out for 3 main things in a VR headset, which are cost, convenience and games supported.
I rate games supported > cost > convenience because I feel that the best VR headset should provide me with a pleasant game experience with the games I want to play at a reasonable price.
However, since my taste in VR games are usually compatible with most VR devices, cost and convenience will be the deciding factor to my prefered VR headset.
In terms of cost, Google Daydream View seems to offer the best value because it uses mobile devices as its processor. Since mobile devices can do other things besides playing VR games, its value is far greater than standalone VR headsets such as Oculus Quest/ Lenovo Mirage Solo where the extra cost for in-built processor can only be used to power VR related content.
Google Daydream View also has better materials which makes it more lasting than Google Cardboard and hence its worth the extra price. Not to mention the aesthetics of Google Daydream looks much better than that of Cardboard, providing a soft comfortable feel akin to wearing a sleeping mask.
In terms of convenience, Google Daydream View wins over wired headsets like Oculus Rift S/HTC Vive as it is so much easier to set up with it and there are no wire management to be done. Google Daydream View is also much more portable compared to Oculus Rift S/HTC Vive which means that I can enjoy my VR games anywhere, anytime.
Though the battery life of Google Daydream View is only as long as your mobile phone can hold which is usually around 2.5 hrs, I feel that it is a sufficient gaming time for me.
Hence my prefered VR headsets would be the Google Daydream View due to its low cost and portability.
Google Daydream View
List of MR headsets:
Headset
Cost (USD)
Field of View
Resolution
Controls
OS
HoloLens 2
3,500
52 by 50
2k
– Hand tracking – Voice recognition
Windows Holographic OS
Magic Leap 1
2,295
43 by 30
1280 by 960
– Physical controller – Hand tracking
Lumin OS
Holokit
30 + supported mobile phone
76
Depends on phone
– Gesture tracking with manomotion – External bluetooth controller
Holokit + phone OS
Occipital Bridge
399 + supported iphone
120
Depends on iphone
– Bridge controller
Bridge Engine + iphone OS
Preferred MR headset:
For MR headset, I would look into 4 things – interface, processing power, graphic quality and control.
I personally rank them as such: control > processing power > graphic quality > interface.
In terms of interface, I am personally more familiar with windows interface and windows OS, hence I find the interfaces of HoloLens 2 more intuitive to use than Magic Leap 1.
In terms of processing power, HoloLens 2 being backed by microsoft provides remote rendering for microsoft azure cloud subscribers, which enabled more powerful processing and hence allows greater interactivity. This cloud processing power also has the potential to surpass any mobile processing power that mobile MR headsets such as Holokit and Occipital Bridge has to offer, making HoloLens 2 having the best processing power out of all the headsets.
In terms of graphic qualtity, HoloLens 2 has a higher resolution and a larger field of view than Magic Leap 1, providing a clearer augmented reality imagery with a greater effective area of AR. Though HoloLens 2 has a smaller field of view compared to mobile MR headsets, it compensates with a much higher holographic image quality of 2K resolution.
In terms of controls, HoloLens 2 has better hand tracking control system that tracks fingers, enabling more interactions to be made possible, such as playing an augmented reality piano without the need of a controller. This enabled organic interactions that feels natural and intuitive.
The Magic Leap 1 hand tracking is much inferior and only tracks 8 predefined gestural commands, hence its main source of input is through a controller.
Occipital bridge and Holokit both enabled interactions but via an external bluetooth controller. Holokit does provides some gesture inputs through monomotion but its tracking are limited to predefined gestures.
Thus, my preferred choice of MR headset would be the HoloLens 2. Although it is much more expensive and is currently only available for corporate purchase, its specifications and features are much better than that of Magic Leap 1. Having a superior hand tracking that enabled organic interactions without any wires provides a seemless MR experience which are not replicatable by any of the other MR headsets currently. I believe if the HoloLens 2 continues to develop, it will eventually be commercialised to the masses which would bring down its price.
Lastly, a quick shoutout on latest list of AR headwear:
Back in 2016, the first few VR devices were clunky, unwieldy and restrictive. My first encounter with VR, Oculus Rift DK2 (on the left), was no exception. It has two wires sticking out of the console which made head movement restrictive. It (and its camera accessory) had to connect to a computer, which reduced its portability. It itself required a rather powerful graphic card to power it, which made the barrier of entry really high.
Now, in 2020, there are multiple VR devices out there in the market.
HTC Vive Pro
Oculus Rift
Playstation VR
Nintendo Labo (well…. it counts)
And my personal favourite, Oculus Quest
Wires? Gone. Requirement of a high-end graphics card? Gone.
It’s hard to not love the advancement of VR technology with the release of Oculus Quest. VR experiences lie on the Immersion and Presence factors, and when motion is restrictive, the VR experience is dampened. The Oculus Quest solves that and a number of problems of its predecessors and even improves the immersion with the exclusion of controllers.
Yes, you heard it. Controllers? Gone.
With all those features packed in a portable headset, Oculus Quest is now my personal favourite (for now).
And while I never really encountered Mixed Reality devices in real life before, the current list of devices out there is pretty long for a niche technology
Magic Leap One
Samsung Odyssey
Dimension NXG AjnaLens
Nreal Light
Zappar Zapbox
And my personal favourite, Hololens 2 (and its predecessor, Hololens)
The Hololens 2 caught my eye for the same reasons as Oculus Quest.
Like the Oculus Quest, there is no need for a high-end PC to power it as it has its own mini processor. It’s portable, lightweight and it has hand tracking. While other MR devices may have similar functions, one edge the Hololens 2 has over its competitors is the amount of support it is given from its parent company (Microsoft), in terms of the UX/UI of the internal OS and developer support.
While the Hololens 2 also triumphs in price (Approx 3k, competitors price less), the technology of Hololens 2 makes every dollar count.
Seeing the step up from the Oculus Rift DK1 to the HTC Vive Pro, the visual quality hasn’t quite improved as much as I expected in 5 years. However, the industry has gone on ahead, with 6DoF, really decent tracking controls and higher refresh rates. More specifically, they have continued developing VR applications, with Valve even releasing a new Half-Life game. Who would’ve thought?
The most exciting trend to me is the development of a budget series of headsets, which definitely didn’t quite exist till recently. The Google Cardboard doesn’t quite count if we’re going to be talking full headsets with motion controls.
Much as cheap Android phones and televisions brought about the new medium to the mass market, it would be terribly safe to say that VR is going to be a thing in the next few years, and that’s why I would like to highlight one of the more prominent mid-range headsets, the Oculus Quest.
The Quest has entered the list of recommendations for the “VR-newbie”, partially offering the experience of the big boys like the Vive and Rift when connected to a PC, yet being an all-in-one package that is also wireless. It may not boast 90Hz+ refresh rates, but it sits squarely at the mid-range with its price. The PC link was a later update, coming in on November 2019, and likely helped boost the headset to its current status of entry-level king.
On the end of MR/AR, there are a few major points to me that I find important in an MR/AR experience. Firstly, as someone who does not wear glasses (weird flex, sorry), I absolutely can not stand the feeling of wearing glasses, and this makes products like the holo-lens and other smart-glasses extremely unappealing to me. Secondly, I currently do not see much value in having an always-on AR application as an average consumer who already spends most of his time looking at a screen anyway. This is not to discount the benefits to those who require assistance in their daily lives, for whom I feel MR/AR has the most use for.
With that in mind, I find the humble(?) smartphone of today to be my preferred way of augmenting reality. Of course, everyone has one these days, and most new smartphones offer multiple cameras which have been used for depth-sensing for selfies. Given that everyone walks around with their smartphones out anyway, I feel they are currently the best way to apply MR/AR applications and have good reach to users.
Some recent smartglasses and headsets I think are great are:
Microsoft HoloLens 2
Magic Leap 1
Solos smartglasses
Vuzix Blade
Epson Moverio
Nintendo Labo VR
HP Reverb
Oculus Quest
Oculus Go
Pimax Vision 8K Plus
Google Daydream
Playstation VR
HP Reverb
My choice of an MR headset is The HP Reverb. The headset provides a wide FOV of 114 degrees with two very crisp 2.9 inch displays of 2160×2160 each, with a refresh rate of 90Hz. It’s quite light at 500g, and is said to be quite comfortable to wear due to adjustable support runs along the top and sides of the head. It has built-in headphones which are removable for auditory immersion. Although it’s more expensive than some of the competing Windows MR headsets, the added FOV and high screen resolution shows what’s possible and is important in encouraging other Windows MR to produce better headsets, which can help drive down the price in the long run. While it does not have as many bells and whistles as some of the bigger names such as Microsoft HoloLens or Magic Leap, it’s tackling the less specialized and more accessible market of Windows entertainment. It’s able to stand out in that market with its specs, which is why I chose it.
Nintendo Labo
The Nintendo Labo VR is a build a simple headset kit for playing a variety of min-games on the Nintendo Switch. It’s very versatile and allows users to create their own mini-games, and is very accessible to beginners while still providing an immersive experience. It does a great job being more than a VR headset just for the sake of VR – it allows people to create novel experiences for themselves. It’s got a low price tag of $80 USD, so it makes a great companion to the Switch, and is able to tackle the large market of family entertainment.
Alto’s Odyssey is a nice mobile game available on both Android and iOS. It is the finalist of 2019 Independent Game Festival under excellence of visual art and excellence of audio.
The game is about an endless sandboarding adventure. The background is a beautiful and ever-changing natural landscape. The player has to jump to cross the obstacles and cliffs along the way. It is designed to be enjoyed by returning player and newcomers alike.
The next adventure awaits
Link to the game: http://www.altosodyssey.com
Lens 1: Essential Experience
The essential experience of Odyssey is to expand and build upon the feelings of being alone to an adventure in nature. Besides, it also encourages the player to step out of their comfort zone to explore the beyond of the world. This kind of experience is achieved by the fluid physics-based actions of the sandboarding, procedurally changed backgrounds, dynamic lighting and weather effects, and the beautiful background audio.
Lens 2 & 3: Suprise & Fun
Odyssey surprises player along the way with various natural phenomena and wildlife. The player has to jump. During the jump, the player can enjoy the fluid physics-based action in the air. Besides, the player can also control the body to land fluidly and successfully.
Lens 4: Curiosity
Odyssey offers the player with a small screen into a much bigger world, through the endless sandhill and procedurally changed backgrounds. The game tries and boils down the essence of immersion. It wants to offer a place where the player can escape.
Lens 5: Endogenous Value
Along the way, the player can collect coins for a higher point. The coins are placed creatively to encourage the players to jump and control the body accordingly. Sometimes it also leads players to a second way to do sandboarding rather than on the sandhill.
Mechanics:
The procedure of Odyssey is quite simple. As the player is on an endless sandboarding adventure, player just need to tap to jump over the obstacles or cliff and hold to control the body before landing. There will be several goals for player to accomplish at each level. The game is over when the player fail to jump over the obstacle or cliff. With the collected coins, the player can buy some special packages to help recover from the death or delay the timer and so on. The game is easy to learn but difficult to master.
Aesthetics:
Odyssey has built a beautiful polygon wild world. The world is expanding endlessly through a small window. Environments is changing accordingly. The background audio matches the action of player, which helps the player to be immersed inside the wild world and control the actions better. It has received critical acclaim as a “piece of interactive art”.
Story:
Odyssey is mainly about adventure. While the world is expanding procedurally through the small window, the player is encouraged to explore and continue this endless adventure.
Technology:
Odessey is designed in Unity 3D, and then taps into Metal 2 for iOS. The game is now available on both Android and iOS. Besides, the game is well achieved with a silky 60 frame-per-second. Metal 2 allows much more access to the GPU compared with OpenGL. During the game, the view never stutters or shakes.
After completing The Witcher 3 I felt a deep loss. I truly became its protagonist Geralt of Rivia; and by the time a legendary career of slaying monsters had come to an end, it was as if a chapter of my own life had ended as well.
A Witcher is a genetically modified professional monster killer. The game follows Geralt on his various quests and contracts, and the friends (and many foes) encountered on the way.
Official gameplay:
Official website: https://thewitcher.com/en/witcher3
The Lens of Surprise:
Geralt is only compensated for contracts on specific monsters, however, other monsters are uninclined to leave you alone as you explore or transit through the open world. Some of your greatest bouts will start running into a dark swamp ill-prepared and low on health. Contracts themselves can often be much more complicated than initially presented. A degree of adaptability and creativity is needed to be successful in quests.
As per typical in role-playing games, characters accumulate new skills and hone existing ones with time. Geralt’s are physical and combat oriented at first, however more magical and mysterious as the game progresses.
The story is also filled with twists and turns. We begin the game looking for an ashen-haired girl who is later revealed to be Geralt’s long lost adopted daughter Ciri – an incredibly powerful young Witcher.
The Lens of Fun:
An obvious source of entertainment is the freedom of choice we posses within the game, furthermore – being able to see the consequences of said choices manifest in plot changes, Geralt’s relationships and available contracts.
Isolated situations are also uniquely thrilling. Awesome fight progressions and visceral combat options make for an intoxicating interactive experience. The exhilaration of facing danger and ordinarily impossible feats is achieved perfectly.
The Lens of Unification:
The world (The Continent) is fictitious, yet the setting greatly resembles a Dark-Age-like time period. Playing as Geralt in this environment is a cohesive and holistic experience. His clothing and weaponry are thematically accurate and even supporting and background characters have nuanced attires and dialects depending on where you are in The Continent. Whether it be on an island in Skellige or in a quaint tavern in Novigrad, your surroundings are detailed and consistent.
The lore in the world is also very detailed, this becomes apparent as you venture to farther lands and collect a wealth of information on the places, people and creatures you encounter. This attention to detail in both the visual non-visual realms of game design create a foundation for the exciting but, importantly, convincing narrative.
The Lens of the Player:
This game is more than entertainment. The enchanting element is its ability to make its players feel powerful and important. Many look to manufactured fantasies when reality is mundane or disappointing. The more believable the fantasy, the greater the escape.
In The Witcher 3, you are Geralt: a powerful and confident man, known the world over for your bravery, strength and success. You are held in high regard by your peers who reside with you in the great castle Kaer Morhen.
Fun is an ultimately superficial lens, achieved by the most trivial games.The degree of control you have over your life in The Witcher compared to (for argument’s sake) the lack of control you have over your own is an irresistible trade. In the game, a player can be seen and heard as they intend; Pursue travel and career risk and romantic relationships with very literally, just the press of a button.
The Lens of the Elemental Tetrad:
The Witcher 3 exemplifies the axioms of good game design. We are drawn into the game by hyper-realistic character and world aesthetics, a thematically complete universe of which we are the centre. A captivating and malleable story with seamless gameplay maintains our emotional investment in the game.
The game was created with the REDengine 3, CD Projekt Red’s game engine specifically designed for nonlinear open world role-playing video games. The engine runs on top of both 32 and 64-bit Windows, PlayStation 4 and Xbox One.
The original Deus Ex released in the year 2000 surprised the first-person shooter world by combining complex role-playing elements with the smooth combat afforded by Unreal Engine at the time. It, along with the Elder Scrolls series went on to define the role-playing first person genre and destroyed the notion that fantasy or science fiction games had to be straight or “on rails” like many games at the time. The game went on to spawn multiple sequels which were mostly successful.
Gameplay – The player engages some enemy soldiers. Note the UI elements. The element in the upper left represents player health, which compartmentalizes damage done the body, At the bottom is the quick inventory and ammo counter. On the right are various augmentations(skills) that can be activated.
Analysis of Game Elements Through Lenses
Story
Deus Ex is set in a dystopian future where science has allowed humans to modify physical aspects of themselves – through augmentations. The story follows JC Denton who is a member of an international peacekeeping force called UNATCO who is tasked to neutralise terrorists that are attempting to steal medicine meant to treat an ongoing plague that has infected thousands.
However, things are not as they seem. Throughout the story, the player can uncover the dark sinister truth not only behind the plague but also about who really controls the world. The story is easy to follow with the game’s AI characters ready to fill the player in on more details should they choose to ask the appropriate questions and an information vault mechanic that keeps track of various story elements the player has discovered. This is combined with the intricate, branching, emotion rich drama sequences filled with betrayal, deceit but also catharsis, camaraderie and a sense of accomplishment after completing each plot thread and seeing them coalesce into the games different endings. I’d say this fills the Lens of Expected Value and Meaningful Choice.
The setting, characters and conflict are completely believable elements to exist in the conflict of their time with most story threads leading to resolutions that satisfy the player.
Aesthethics
Deus Ex was visually unappealing for the time. The Elder Scrolls series among other games had better graphics, however the game made up for the lack in fidelity with other aspects.
Firstly, the environments were true to life and realistic. The game takes the player on an international trip with locations such as the poor districts of New York, the ostentatious streets of Hong Kong, the lavish estates of Paris. Each environment is huge for the time and no space is wasted. Each corner may have a different kind of secret or story bead to follow. A dark alley might reveal a vendor, fun challenge or lead to a sewer laboratory where a clandestine government agency is experimenting on homeless people for nefarious purposes. Lens 2: Surprise and Lens 4: Curiosity can be said to be satisfied here.
Secondly, the audio. All the dialog sequences in the game are voiced well and audio cues such as footsteps, gun sounds, doors opening etc, were the best at the time. Being a role-playing game this element is critical to develop the mood and emotions that a player might feel to the environment or develop a connection to the game’s many characters.
Thirdly, the UI. The UI might feel cluttered and janky today with it being fixed in resolution (thus the higher the res you run your game on the smaller it becomes) but for the time it felt appropriate that a super-augmented police agent would have a UI that presents everything at his disposal in little boxes at the edge of his screen. Perhaps it was the influence of science fiction of the time such as Robocop.
Lastly, the mechanics. The game allowed a player to progress in different ways not just in the story but in combat sequences as well. Different skills and augmentations allowed players to approach conflict and resolve them in unique ways, whether it be a stealthy takedown or avoidance of enemies, guns-blazing invincible super soldier-like romping, remote hacking of computer systems and robots that do your job for you or dialog. Yes, dialog is THE most important mechanic of this game. Often conflict can be resolved or made significantly easier if you walk around and talk. That bum on the street may just know of a secret passage into that heavily guarded enemy hideout…(Lens 6: Problem Solving)
Combined, these basic elements lend to a very engrossing and replayable game, with each playthrough teaching players new areas or tricks they may have missed out if they played differently. The only part of the tetrad missing is technology. It can be argued that the decision to base the game on Unreal was a good decision as it has been ported to almost any device that can run the Unreal engine such as consoles and mobile phones.
I hope other appreciate this game as I did back in my childhood.
:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/65646434/vpavic_190131_3213_0203.0.jpg)
